An extraordinary spat is occurring within the U.S. judiciary concerning a flurry of Supreme Court decisions backing President Donald Trump, with judges voicing confusion over the rulings issued on an emergency basis while a Trump-appointed justice accused some of them of defying the nation's top judicial body.

The White House and other international leaders condemn Israel’s strike in Qatar. Trump’s tariffs showdown gets a date with the Supreme Court. Poland shoots down a "huge number" of Russian drones. And, giving the middle finger at a war memorial results in a tragic shooting death.

ScotusCrim is a recurring series by Rory Little focusing on intersections between the Supreme Court and criminal law. Please note that the views of outside contributors do not reflect the […]

The Supreme Court’s scant explanation in recent emergency decisions backing President Trump is sparking increasing debate among lower judges — and even the justices themselves. The Supreme

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett says “violence or threats of violence” against judges shouldn’t be the cost of public service.

California Democrats swiftly blasted the move. Gov. Gavin Newsom described the Supreme Court’s conservative majority as the “Grand Marshal for a parade of racial terror in Los Angeles.”

John Roberts has served for two decades as the chief justice of the United States, a time when the Supreme Court has moved American law dramatically to the right. Here is a look in chronological order at a dozen instrumental decisions by the court since Roberts,

"My office doesn't entitle me to align the legal system with my moral or policy views," the Trump-appointed justice wrote in her new book.