The House settlement has set the stage for revenue-sharing between universities and their athletes. Here's a look at what the settlement means moving forward.

The fund for past athletes will likely result in reduced NCAA payouts for member schools which Purdue estimates to be around a loss of $1.2 million per year for 10 years. Other than that, they want you to give more money. It’s really that simple.

The term has emerged as the most important part of the long-awaited legal settlement that will greatly reshape college sports, following its approval late last week. This is that House v. NCAA thing that’d been drip-dripping in the news forever, the Colleges Can Now Pay Their Athletes Actual Money thing.

A multibillion-dollar settlement paves the way for colleges to pay athletes who competed between 2016 and now. The Friars’ share will be “significant,” PC’s athletic director says.

As the future of college athletics goes through a dramatic change, the University of Colorado is prepared to go all-in.

What’s in a (domain) name? Within an hour of Judge Claudia Wilken having granted final approval of the House v. NCAA settlement, the newly established College Sports Commission’s website went live, featuring a homepage headline declaring “a new day in college sports” beside a picture of female water polo players.

Conference commissioners lauded a judge’s approval of a $2.8 billion antitrust lawsuit settlement as a means for bringing stability and fairness to an out-of-control college athletics industry.